Super Lawyers
The top Attorneys in Virginia and
the Washington, D.C. metropolitan
area, only 5% of the attorneys
in the state are named in SuperLawyers
ATA NBTA | The National Board of Trial Advocacy Association of Trial Lawyers of America Virginia Trial Lawyers Association National Asociation of Distinguished Counsel | Nation's Top One Percent | NADC

Supreme Court upholds decision favoring class actions

Virginia shareholders may be interested in reading about a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision. The Court ruled that, although shareholders will still be allowed to bring class action lawsuits against companies, there will be new requirements for shareholders who are bringing securities fraud class actions.

The defendant in this case, the oil giant Halliburton, had been asking the Supreme Court to overturn a landmark decision from 1988, a case which provided the foundation for many of the class action lawsuits brought by shareholders. The 1988 case said that shareholders could file a class action lawsuit for fraud based on the presumption that investors take public misstatements into account when deciding whether to purchase shares, a presumption known as "the fraud on the market" theory. This presumption made it easier for shareholders to become certified as a class.

In this most recent case against Halliburton, the shareholder plaintiffs were alleging that the falsified earnings reports that were issued by Halliburton's management hurt the investors, since Halliburton's stock dropped by 42 percent on the day that it was shown that Halliburton's statements and representations about its asbestos liability and the benefits of an upcoming merger were false. However, the Supreme Court did say that Halliburton should have an opportunity to show that an alleged misrepresentation did not affect the price of its stock, which put a dent in the automatic presumption of fraud on the market.

A backer of Halliburton said that the decision would reduce the cost of business litigation, although the source said that the 1988 decision should have been overturned. With class action lawsuits still a possibility for shareholders, businesses may want to consult with an attorney to discuss ways in which to avoid taking actions that may lead to allegations of fraud or breach of fiduciary duty to investors.

Source: Bloomberg Businessweek, "Supreme Court Curbs, but Doesn't Kill, the Shareholder Class Action", Paul M. Barrett, June 23, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

DISCLAIMER: This website is designed to provide only general information; nothing contained herein constitutes legal advice nor is it an offer of legal representation. Use of this website is not intended in any way to create or convey the impression that such use of the website by any person, organization, or entity of any nature and/or kind constitutes any attorney-client relationship whatsoever and any information provided in this website shall not constitute legal advice. The use of any electronic communication available through this website with the Law Office of Richard L. Downey or any person associated with this website shall not constitute attorney-client relationship nor will any communication received by the Law Office of Richard L. Downey constitute an attorney-client communication. The Law Office of Richard L. Downey cannot make any guarantees as to the accuracy or currency of any information contained in or created in this website or the use of any link to another website contained in this website. The information that you obtain at this website is not, nor is it intended to be legal advice. You should consult a lawyer for individual advice concerning your own particular situation.

*The National Board of Trial Advocacy is accredited by the American Bar Association. Currently there is no procedure in the Commonwealth of Virginia for approving certifying organizations.